Education is a Process of Enlightenment - 4. Swami Krishnananda.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, August 11, 2021. 6:48. AM.
(Spoken on July 26, 1976.)
Post-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the state of deep sleep we exist in a condition bereft of physical consciousness. How can we find out what our condition in the state of deep sleep is when we are bereft of physical and social consciousness? Our state of being in deep sleep is something impersonal, really speaking. Our body is not there and our mind is not functioning, and yet we exist. That means to say, it is possible to exist bereft of physical and mental consciousness, but ordinarily it is impossible for us to conceive such a condition.
The metaphysical aspect of the situation is that our essential nature is revealed in the state of deep sleep. The memory that we subsequently have of having slept proves that a conscious substance of our personality was present in deep sleep. Though we could not perceive anything in sleep, we could infer this fact. We had an essential conscious existence there, though it was not a content of our living experience.
Now I take you a little bit deeper into the philosophical implication of the situation. This substance that we were in the state of deep sleep could not have been anything other than pure consciousness. It could not have been merely a physical or a mental existence. Our essential nature must have been consciousness somehow or other, notwithstanding that we could not be aware of it. If this had not been the case, we would not have remembered that we slept.
Consciousness is a peculiar fluid being which cannot be compared with anything visible in this world. Some people, especially in the West, believe that the so-called thing called consciousness is only an exudation from the material contents of the brain. They imagine that consciousness can project itself from the brain just as flames spark forth from a matchstick, so it is falsely deduced that consciousness is an effect of matter. It is illogical to presume that the effect can be conscious of the cause, and if consciousness had been the effect, it could not have known the existence of matter.
Further, it is difficult to understand what the connection between consciousness and matter is. We cannot glibly say, “I see and perceive and know the existence of matter,” without explaining how it is possible. Consciousness cannot know the existence of matter, as they are dissimilar in character. If consciousness and matter were ultimately different in nature, there would have been no knowledge of the existence of matter at all. It would be impossible to have even known the existence of matter if they were totally dissimilar. So it is not true that they are even basically dissimilar.
To be continued ....
========================================================
Comments
Post a Comment